DIGITAL FORENSIC SUPPORT
FOR LITIGATION
Converting complex device architecture, unallocated master file blocks, and volatile telemetry files into unassailable, court-admissible facts.
Modern courtroom disputes are won or lost based on the validity of electronic records. Loose screenshots and printouts are easily challenged by opposing counsel. Our examiners apply rigorous validation checks compliant with the Singapore Evidence Act framework to guarantee that your electronic discovery, mobile databases, and deleted data traces stand up completely under intense cross-examination.
Our laboratory procedures ensure strict cryptographic chain-of-custody tracking. Every bit-stream image clone extracted from endpoints matches hash parameters perfectly, locking evidence securely against claims of tampering.
01 // LITIGATION SUPPORT CAPABILITIES
How our technical extraction lab serves corporate counsel and independent litigation panels.
Anton Piller Search Executions
Providing rapid, on-site technical response teams to assist legal counsel during court-ordered search orders. We execute fast, legally defensible, bit-level data extractions of active corporate databases and personal systems before data can be deleted.
Expert Witness Reports
Compiling highly technical, reproducible forensic analytical reports. Our expert examiners convert dense code logs and system structures into clear timelines that simplify technical terms for judges, arbiters, and legal teams.
Evidence Manipulation Audits
Validating the authenticity of submitted digital evidence. We analyze metadata headers, verify communication packet dates, check internal message databases, and trace system timelines to detect altered emails, doctored chats, or false signatures.
>> FORENSIC CASE APPLICATION LOGS
CASE 01 // MATTHEW_PELOSO_v_KUMAR
Landmark Signature Forgery Analysis [2023] SGHC 308
Context: In a high-profile S$5.15 million investment dispute before the High Court of Singapore, the authenticity of a critical multi-million dollar investment contract was heavily contested. The defense claimed the signature was a total fabrication.
Forensic Action: Infinity Forensics executed a comprehensive digital biometric signature analysis. Our lab proved that the contested signature was "almost superimposable" and aligned perfectly with a known signature from a separate document, concluding that one was copied and digitally inserted. This critical evidence proved it is biologically impossible for a human to sign two identical wet-ink signatures, determining the factual outcome of the High Court proceedings.
CASE 02 // COMPUTER_MISUSE_SEC3
Exposing Corporate IP Misappropriation
Context: A high-frequency proprietary trading firm discovered that a departing quantitative trader had copied thousands of critical algorithmic reconciliation tools and market trackers to private cloud storage accounts the day before resigning, intentionally deleting the zip folders to hide the trail.
Forensic Action: Instructed by legal counsel, our team performed deep endpoint carving and shell item analysis on the workstation. We successfully mapped the data exfiltration events and traced file deletion times. This definitive timeline supported a successful private prosecution under Section 3(1) of the Computer Misuse Act for unauthorized access to data.
CASE 03 // CIV_PROCEDURE_EVIDENCE
Detecting Fabricated WhatsApp Log Submissions
Context: In a bitter contractual breach dispute, a claimant submitted printed screenshots of mobile chat history to validate an alleged multi-million dollar business agreement amendment.
Forensic Action: Our lab was retained to perform a physical inspection of the source smartphone filesystem. By extracting the raw SQLite database structure, our examiners proved that the database record maps had been altered using external software tools to change message text and date fields, exposing a massive attempt to mislead the court.
CASE 04 // ANTON_PILLER_EXECUTION
Anton Piller Order On-Site Evidence Ingestion
Context: A local shipping enterprise obtained an urgent Anton Piller (civil search) order against three former directors suspected of setting up a parallel competing entity using stolen supply line manifests.
Forensic Action: Acting as independent data experts under court supervision, our mobile and computer forensic team executed an immediate, on-site live data ingestion process. Within 4 hours, we captured cryptographically sound bit-stream images of 12 endpoints and cloud repositories, preserving critical metadata before destruction could occur.
CASE 05 // FAMILY_LAW_MATRIMONIAL
Uncovering Concealed Matrimonial Capital
Context: During highly contentious ancillary matrimonial hearings before the Family Courts, a spouse claimed total asset insolvency, declaring no offshore capital or active undeclared assets.
Forensic Action: Our mobile logical extraction desk analyzed a legacy tablet under disclosure rules. By running database file carving, we recovered deleted email application records and un-flushed browser cache artifacts, unearthing active registration parameters for offshore asset platforms and hidden cryptocurrency wallets.
CASE 06 // INSOLVENCY_TRACK_SEC64
Tracking Pre-Bankruptcy Asset Siphons
Context: Liquidators administering a collapsed commodities trading entity suspected that corporate directors had intentionally scrubbed financial data platforms to hide transactions preceding insolvency.
Forensic Action: Our lab deployed specialized data recovery tools across the enterprise server frames. By auditing transaction log histories and rebuilding corrupt system index maps, our team reconstructed a hidden transfer timeline that enabled liquidators to pursue clawback claims under Section 64 of the Evidence Act.
Litigation Forensic FAQs
Understanding admissibility guidelines, data preservation parameters, and expert witness support criteria.
1. Are your reporting parameters compliant with the Singapore Evidence Act?
Absolutely. All extraction loops, system data imaging processes, and metadata extraction steps are documented meticulously to satisfy the strict secondary electronic evidence requirements defined under Section 64 of the Singapore Evidence Act.
2. Why is a professional forensic extraction preferred over basic IT file exports in court?
Standard IT file copying modifies underlying file system metadata, including file creation and modification timestamps, which can allow opposing counsel to challenge its authenticity. Our lab applies strict cryptographic write-blocking parameters to create an exact clone without modifying single system properties, preserving evidence integrity perfectly.
3. How does the lab identify if an electronic document or email archive has been backdated or altered?
We analyze hidden system layers, structural data block indexes, and alternative system application registries. While a file's user-facing date can be modified, system logs like the Master File Table (MFT) record alternative timestamps that expose backdating manipulation attempts.
4. What is a cryptographic hash verification, and why does it matter for litigation?
A cryptographic hash function functions as a unique digital fingerprint for a data volume. If even a single text character inside a cloned drive file is modified, the resulting hash verification string shifts entirely. Matching hash parameters serve as definitive proof that evidence has not been tampered with.
5. What role do your examiners play during an Anton Piller search order execution?
Our examiners act as independent technical data specialists. We carry specialized field hardware kits straight to the target location to perform forensically sound, read-only acquisitions of target data layers from endpoints, cloud portals, and local storage arrays, following precise judicial scope rules.
6. Can your experts testify directly in the High Court of Singapore?
Yes. Our senior forensic examiners compile highly comprehensive, reproducible expert reports designed to satisfy strict judicial guidelines, and are available to deliver cross-examination-ready technical testimonies.
7. Can you assist legal teams with managing large volumes of data during electronic discovery?
Yes. We specialize in processing raw, unstructured data lakes into clean, reviewable formats, applying keyword filtering and removing duplicate system files to help legal counsel review responsive files efficiently.
WHY INFINITY FORENSICS ?
Why Infinity Forensics (Private) Limited?
Infinity Forensics has a comprehensive range of computer forensics services to help organizations, and key individuals within those organizations, make informed decisions and mitigate potential electronic evidence risks. We have a highly experienced team of engineers and ways of working that are second to none.
Computer forensics has become increasingly important as fraud, financial irregularities, employee misconduct and commercial disputes threaten company finances and reputations while creating serious regulatory risks.
Utilizing state-of-the-art techniques, Infinity Forensics's specialists enable the recovery and use of critical electronic whether evidence has been erased or modified for litigation, investigations, audits and other fact-finding exercises.
COMPANY
SOLUTIONS
resources
LEGAL
contact
(62) 1829017
Hello@marketer.com
2912 Meadowbrook Road, 
Los Angeles, CA 90017